For low-income families, health and adequate housing can feel like an impossible tradeoff. Many are incremental builders—shut out of formal housing markets and unable to afford high‑quality materials or certified labor—who construct their homes slowly, with whatever resources are available. In places like Kenya, high material costs and long‑standing building practices mean that many homes, particularly in rural areas, have grass‑thatched roofs, unsealed eaves, poorly sized or unscreened windows, ill‑fitting doors, and insufficient mosquito screening. It creates ideal entry points for mosquitoes that spread malaria. Bakari’s home was no exception.
Yet even small improvements can make a difference.
In sub‑Saharan Africa, Habitat’s healthy housing programming includes malaria prevention and water, sanitation and hygiene interventions. Replacing dirt floors with concrete reduces parasitic infections. Repairing leaky roofs eliminates mold. Installing screens keeps disease‑carrying insects out. Even simple home upgrades can dramatically reduce vulnerability to malaria and other illnesses.
“We want malaria to become a top‑of‑mind issue for everyone involved in the housing sector—not just for public health actors,” says Roland Pearson, vice president at Habitat for Humanity’s Terwilliger Center for Innovation in Shelter. “When we frame malaria as a challenge that can be addressed through smart, cost‑effective housing improvements, we can encourage the entire housing value chain to incorporate targeted solutions into their products and services. That’s how malaria prevention becomes mainstream, and how homes become safer for families across all income levels.”
Innovations that close the door to malaria
To strengthen the links between health and malaria free homes, Habitat’s Terwilliger Center for Innovation in Shelter is helping drive scientific, community‑informed and market‑ready solutions that reduce mosquito entry into homes.
In 2021, the Terwilliger Center partnered with SeaFreight Labs to launch an open‑innovation challenge seeking practical and affordable ways to modify existing homes and reduce malaria transmission in Kenya. Among 78 submissions, the winning concept, “Mosquito Free Homes: Air Cavities and Screens,” proposed a simple and affordable modification which included the installation of air cavities for improved ventilation and lighting while blocking mosquito entry, combined with striped nets and Velcro‑based screens for windows, doors, and eaves.
The solution caught the attention of local stakeholders. When tested at the Kenya Medical Research Institute in Kisumu, this solution reduced indoor mosquitoes by an astonishing 89%.
Though initial field pilots in rural communities raised concerns about aesthetics, privacy and cold temperatures during cold months, the innovation generated valuable insights that continue to shape new prototypes and community‑driven refinements.
Habitat’s collaboration with KEMRI deepened in 2022, leading to a landmark peer-reviewed, field study published in Nature Medicine in early 2026. The study evaluated low‑cost modifications—including cool roofs, cross‑ventilation, papyrus‑mat ceilings and mosquito screening—across rural homes in western Kenya. And the results were clear:
- Screens reduced the number of malaria‑carrying mosquitoes indoors by 77%.
- Cool roofs significantly lowered indoor temperatures by up to 3.3°C, helping households withstand extreme heat.
- 85% of participating families expressed their willingness to invest their own resources in similar upgrades.
In addition to the immediate health and wellbeing benefits of these interventions, the interest of families in investing in these homes is crucial. It signals real potential for long‑term, market‑driven adoption of healthier housing designs.
“Collaborating with Habitat for Humanity has strengthened our ability to test housing‑related malaria interventions in real‑world settings,” Dr. Bernard Abong’o, lead researcher at KEMRI’s Centre for Global Health Research. “KEMRI brings the research, and Habitat contributes practical insights into how housing improvements are adopted, built, and financed by low‑income households. This combination helps ensure solutions are evaluated not only for their technical performance, but also for their affordability and suitability for the communities that are most affected.”